On Monday 19 October 2015 11:37:00 Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:23:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I haven't checked all architectures, but I assume what happens is that > > > 64-bit ones just #define atomic64_t atomic_long_t, so they don't have > > > to provide three sets of functions. > > > > scratch that, I just looked at all the architectures and found that it's > > just completely arbitrary, even within one architecture you get a mix > > of 'long' and 'long long', plus this gem from MIPS: > > > > static __inline__ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u) > > > > which truncates the result to 32 bit. > > Eh... The result is 0/1 so nothing is truncated. Alpha, MIPS, > PARISC and PowerPC are using the same prototype and x86 only differs > in the use of inline instead __inline__. And anyway, that function on > MIPS is only built for CONFIG_64BIT. Ah, got it. Sorry about that. > What's wrong on MIPS is the comment describing the function's return value > which was changed by f24219b4e90cf70ec4a211b17fbabc725a0ddf3c (atomic: move > atomic_add_unless to generic code) and I've queued up a patch to fix that > since a few days. I guess that was a cut and paste error from > __atomic_add_unless which indeed does return the old value. Thanks! Arnd _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
