On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30/09/2015 at 17:16:10 -0500, Rob Herring wrote : >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Alexandre Belloni >> <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Use "qiaodian" as the vendor prefix for QiaoDian Xianshi Corporation in >> > device tree compatible strings. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > index ac5f0c34ae00..76579e2ef162 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ qca Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. >> > qcom Qualcomm Technologies, Inc >> > qemu QEMU, a generic and open source machine emulator and virtualizer >> > qi Qi Hardware >> > +qd QiaoDian XianShi Corporation >> >> Doesn't match the commit msg... >> > > Yeah, I was not sure which one I should use actually, is "qd" > sufficient? I couldn't find much information on the company, I chose to > use the prefix they use for their parts. I would lean toward qiaodian, but either is fine. Rob _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel