Hi Evgeny, On 26 September 2015 at 22:43, evgeny litvinenko <evgeny.v.litvinenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Emil, > >> Including limits.h does seem like the right way forward. Can you send a git >> format-patch created fix to the ML [1]? > Output of format-patch is at the end of the email. > > I added '#include <limits.h>' right before '#include <dirent.h>' > because on Debian 8 (jessie) the file dirent.h includes bits/posix1_lim.h > which indirectly includes limits.h. > Also bits/posix1_lim.h has the comment - 'Never include this file > directly; use <limits.h> instead.' > > After the patch I built and run make check; make distcheck on Debian - > no errors. > >> Additionally you should have noticed a bunch of warnings (missing >> implementation of XXX) on non-linux platforms. >> If you'd like to solve these but you're unsure what exactly the functions are >> supposed to do, let me know and I can help out. You can also catch me at >> #dri-devel (freenode), look for xexaxo. > > Thanks! > Yes I'd like and will try to solve these 'missing implementation', > I'll ask you if I have questions. > Glad to hear. > > ----------------------- Output of format-patch -------------- > From 0b491abb893d0faf1a9fe0e3052255bf5ad72592 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Evgeny Litvinenko <evgeny.v.litvinenko@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 22:58:15 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] [Bug 92082] Solaris fix: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared > > --- I have applied an identical patch from Felix, hope you don't mind. Mostly because extracting patch fixed with comments is slightly awkward. For the future please use git send-email or paste the contents in your email client (check for wrapping) adding any comments after the --- line. Thank you Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
