Hi On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:21:31PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> Various cleanups to the DRM core initialization and exit handlers: >> >> - Register chrdev last: Once register_chrdev() returns, open() will >> succeed on the given chrdevs. This is usually not an issue, as no >> chardevs are registered, yet. However, nodes can be created by >> user-space via mknod(2), even though such major/minor combinations are >> unknown to the kernel. Avoid calling into drm_stub_open() in those >> cases. >> Again, drm_stub_open() would just bail out as the inode is unknown, >> but it's really non-obvious if you hack on drm_stub_open(). >> >> - Unify error-paths into just one label. All the error-path helpers can >> be called even though the constructors were not called yet, or failed. >> Hence, just call all cleanups unconditionally. >> >> - Call into drm_global_release(). This is a no-op, but provides >> debugging helpers in case there're GLOBALS left on module unload. This >> function was unused until now. >> >> - Use DRM_ERROR() instead of printk(), and also print the error-code on >> failure (even if it is static!). >> >> - Don't throw away error-codes of register_chrdev()! >> >> - Don't hardcode -1 as errno. This is just plain wrong. >> >> - Order exit-handlers in the exact reverse order of initialization >> (except if the order actually matters for syncing-reasons, which is >> not the case here, though). >> >> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >> index 58299f7..bf2924b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c >> @@ -829,50 +829,50 @@ static const struct file_operations drm_stub_fops = { >> >> static int __init drm_core_init(void) >> { >> - int ret = -ENOMEM; >> + int ret; >> >> drm_global_init(); >> drm_connector_ida_init(); >> idr_init(&drm_minors_idr); >> >> - if (register_chrdev(DRM_MAJOR, "drm", &drm_stub_fops)) >> - goto err_p1; >> - >> ret = drm_sysfs_init(); >> if (ret < 0) { >> - printk(KERN_ERR "DRM: Error creating drm class.\n"); >> - goto err_p2; >> + DRM_ERROR("Cannot create DRM class: %d\n", ret); >> + goto error; >> } >> >> drm_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("dri", NULL); >> if (!drm_debugfs_root) { >> - DRM_ERROR("Cannot create /sys/kernel/debug/dri\n"); >> - ret = -1; >> - goto err_p3; >> + ret = -ENOMEM; >> + DRM_ERROR("Cannot create debugfs-root: %d\n", ret); >> + goto error; >> } >> >> + ret = register_chrdev(DRM_MAJOR, "drm", &drm_stub_fops); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + goto error; >> + >> DRM_INFO("Initialized %s %d.%d.%d %s\n", >> CORE_NAME, CORE_MAJOR, CORE_MINOR, CORE_PATCHLEVEL, CORE_DATE); >> return 0; >> -err_p3: >> - drm_sysfs_destroy(); >> -err_p2: >> - unregister_chrdev(DRM_MAJOR, "drm"); >> >> +error: >> + debugfs_remove(drm_debugfs_root); >> + drm_sysfs_destroy(); >> idr_destroy(&drm_minors_idr); >> -err_p1: >> + drm_connector_ida_destroy(); >> + drm_global_release(); >> return ret; > > Since unregister_chardev can cope if we haven't registered the range yet, > can't we just call drm_core_exit here for simplicity and robustness? Unlike the other cleanups, unregister_chrdev() deals with global resources. So if some other module had those majors registered, we'd 'steal' them here. Unfortunately, register_chrdev() doesn't return any pointer to us, which we could use to pass to unregister_chrdev().. I don't mind changing it, your call. Thanks David _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel