On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> i.e. 59 commits in a 5000 commit tree is likely not that bad, 59
> commits in a 20 commit tree would be bad.
I think it's about size of the commits. If it's 59 clean oneliner
fixes, I don't think it's a big deal. If it's 59 patches that add new
functionality, that's a different issue. The size of the base tree is
almost entirely irrelevant in that situation. Fixes are ok, new
features are not.
Linus
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
