On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 07:03:11PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > AKA: just replace your entire "compute_n" function with: > > return (128 * freq) / 1000; > > ...and it's 100% simpler _and_ gets you a (marginally) better rate > (assuming you really have 22.175000). If it was just about a > 32000.222 vs 32000 I'd not be saying anything right now. It's about > adding complexity. No. It doesn't work for all cases. Do the calculations for every sample rate in those tables in the HDMI spec, and you'll find out why. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
