On 08/27/2015 09:06 AM, Hwang, Dongseong wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Tiago Vignatti
+#define DMA_BUF_BASE 'b'
'b' is occupied by vme and qat driver;
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt#L201
I believe this is alright, as noted in that txt file: "Because of the
large number of drivers, many drivers share a partial letter with other
drivers".
is it bad idea for drm.h to include these definition?
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/uapi/drm/drm.h#L684
this is not a drm code and other type of device drivers might want to
use it as well.
Tiago
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
