On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:50:34PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 27-08-15 om 14:48 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 27-08-15 om 14:19 schreef Daniel Stone: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On 4 August 2015 at 12:34, Maarten Lankhorst > >>> <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> Commit ec9f932ed41622d120de52a5b525e4d77b9ef17e > >>>> "drm/atomic: Cleanup on error properly in the atomic ioctl." > >>>> cleaned up some error paths, but didn't fix the TEST_ONLY path. > >>>> In the check only case plane->fb shouldn't be updated, and > >>>> the vblank events should be cleared as on failure. > >>> Bikeshedding a bit ... > >>> > >>> An early test precludes TEST_ONLY | PAGE_FLIP_EVENT, so you don't need > >>> to mention this in the commit message; in this case, the main change > >>> is about plane->{,old_}fb. > >> Even testing with PAGE_FLIP_EVENT would be useful because > >> event && !crtc_state->active should not be allowed. In that case test > >> could succeed but commit could fail. > > Why would commit fail when the we're in DPMS off? I would suggest it > > should be allowed. The operation would just a be a nop from a HW point > > of view, all the calculation/checks would still be performed. > > > You can commit, just not with PAGE_FLIP_EVENT set when crtc is inactive. What's so special about the event here? Just send it out as soon as the state has been swapped. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel