https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95911 --- Comment #21 from Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #20) > Does this help? I'm afraid you're wasting your time here, since the bug reporter refuses to build a kernel for testing fixes. Anyway, FWIW: > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c > index 5751446..1b4ac44 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c > @@ -435,14 +435,14 @@ static int radeon_pmops_freeze(struct device *dev) > { > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > - return radeon_suspend_kms(drm_dev, false, true); > + return radeon_suspend_kms(drm_dev, true, true); > } > > static int radeon_pmops_thaw(struct device *dev) > { > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > - return radeon_resume_kms(drm_dev, false, true); > + return radeon_resume_kms(drm_dev, true, true); > } > > static int radeon_pmops_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) The freeze callback change makes sense to me, but the thaw callback should probably enable the device, not disable it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
