On 30 July 2015 at 16:02, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Bryan O'Donoghue > <pure.logic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 30/07/15 15:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >>> >>> On 30/07/15 15:49, Peter Hurley wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/30/2015 10:12 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is this happening with libdrm 2.4.60? If so, that's a known >>>>> (user-side) issue and should be fixed by using any version but that >>>>> one. >>>> >>>> >>>> What's the freedesktop bugzilla # for reference? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Peter Hurley >>> >>> >>> I believe it's this one >>> >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89842#c19 >>> >> >> Not really a world of choice on ubuntu to fix it though... >> >> deckard@aineko:~/Development/projectara$ apt-show-versions libdrm2 >> libdrm2:amd64/trusty-updates 2.4.60-2~ubuntu14.04.1 uptodate >> libdrm2:i386/trusty-updates 2.4.60-2~ubuntu14.04.1 uptodate >> >> :( > > That's unfortunate. I know next to nothing about debian/ubuntu or how > they do versions or how to even build packages for them. But they're > big distros, presumably they have support teams of some sort, perhaps > they can help you. > > Assuming that switching away does resolve the issue for you, perhaps > you can also recommend that they avoid shipping that version, or > include this nouveau fix in it: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=812e8fe6ce46d733c30207ee26c788c61f546294 > Fwiw debian has been tracking this as #789759, and they are shipping 2.4.62 which includes the fix. > This whole libdrm thing is a bit of a cluster%@#$ unfortunately -- > 2.4.60 is broken for nouveau, building even the latest released > xf86-video-intel against 2.4.61+ causes it to not start ("fixed" in > xf86-video-intel git), and newer mesa requires libdrm 2.4.60+. > I'm wondering if xf86-video-intel cannot, use libdrm's "features" rather than having a local copy of every drm change for the last 2 years. If bumping the requirement is not an option, then having a few build/compile time checks should do just fine. Either way I'm glad that it wasn't me how broke that one :-P -Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
