On 16 July 2015 at 19:05, Jonathan Gray <jsg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:55:40PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> The whole thing is quite messy - the file is used to indicate that the >> man pages were correctly generated prior to applying the "fixup" (alias) >> >> At the same time we use a rule with the same name, to create the same >> file if the generation has failed. >> >> In other words - it attempts to create the file either way. So there is >> little point in it and we can remove it. >> >> Spotted while attempting to build with bmake which kindly blocked on the >> following (non compliant construct) >> >> .man_fixup: | $(miscman_DATA) >> >> Cc: Jonathan Gray <jsg@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Jonathan, >> >> With the following patch libdrm build fine on my Arch + bmake. >> The `dist' target is still broken, yet `all' and `check' work great. >> >> Will you guys consider moving back to the upstream build ? As mentioned >> before if there are problems do mention/file bugs so that we can get >> them sorted. > > Hi Emil, > > I've taken a quick look at extracting patches from the OpenBSD version > and put the result up here: > > https://github.com/jonathangray/drm/commits/openbsd > > I'm in Canada at the moment so won't be able to test on Radeon for a > week or so but this seems to work on i915 at least. > > Currently we don't duplicate the public drm headers between userland > and the kernel but we could move back to doing things that > way. > > I can clean those patches up and submit them if you like. > The xenocara wrapper makefile is just to fit into the > system makefiles so you can ignore that one. This and your three patches are in master now. Hopefully we'll get the remaining diff between libdrm and {Open,Net,*}BSD sorted in the not too distant future :) Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
