On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:06:23PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: > The top level drm Kconfig is a bit messy at the moment. Most of the drm > drivers have their own Kconfig files, but a few have their Kconfig files > in the top level Kconfig option itself. > > Create new Kconfig files for drivers that don't have one. This cleans up > the Kconfig quite a bit > > Archit Taneja (10): > drm/tdfx: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > drm/r128: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > drm/radeon: clean up: move config option to driver's own Kconfig file > drm/amdgpu: clean up: move config option to driver's own Kconfig file > drm/i810: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > drm/mga: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > drm/sis: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > drm/via: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > drm/savage: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > drm/misc: clean up: group device specific Kconfigs > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 116 ++++++------------------------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig | 19 ++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i810/Kconfig | 8 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/mga/Kconfig | 8 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/r128/Kconfig | 8 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/Kconfig | 21 +++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/savage/Kconfig | 7 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/sis/Kconfig | 8 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/tdfx/Kconfig | 6 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/via/Kconfig | 6 ++ > 10 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i810/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/mga/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/r128/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/savage/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sis/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tdfx/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/via/Kconfig Looking at the current state of the top-level Kconfig file, I think it'd be a good idea to sort it in some way once this series has been merged. There are a bunch of options that are interleaved in completely non- intuitive ways. I'm not sure what the best ordering would be, but I'd suggest to at least order them alphabetically. I think it'd also make sense to separate out panel and bridge drivers so that they are listed at the very bottom. Perhaps also splitting legacy drivers and modesetting drivers might be useful, though perhaps a little discriminatory... Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
