Hello!
Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 07/13/2015 11:04 AM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>
>>> On 07/12/2015 06:06 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>>>> Hello Andrzej!
>>>>
>>>> Just some small comments.
>>>>
>>>> It seems like linux-samsung-soc wasn't put into Cc for '[PATCH RESEND
>>>> 0/6] drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes' (even though this series was),
>>>> maybe you should also forward the other series to this list.
>>> Yes, I forgot about it.
>>>
>>>> This series doesn't apply cleanly when 'drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes'
>>>> is applied. E.g. the 'powered' boolean was removed by that series, but
>>>> here in patch 2/7 ('drm/exynos/hdmi: Simplify HPD gpio handling') it's
>>>> still there.
>>> 'drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes' removes powered field from
>>> mixer driver, and powered field in the patch 2/7 is from hdmi driver.
>>> So they should not interfere and for sure they do not interfere in my local git :)
>>> Have you any warning when you tried to apply those patches.
>> yes of course, otherwise I wouldn't point this out. The specific hunks
>> just fail.
>>
>> Which is kinda obvious:
>>> @@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ struct hdmi_context {
>>> struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>>> struct drm_connector connector;
>>> struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>>> - bool hpd;
>>> bool powered;
>>> bool dvi_mode;
>>> struct mutex hdmi_mutex;
>> This doesn't apply when 'powered' is no longer ther.
>
> I have this field still present in my tree which is build of following components:
> - current exynos-drm-next,
> - drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes,
> - this patchset
>
> Could you show me exactly which patch removes this field?
>
> As I mentioned one patch removes similar field from mixer driver, but not from hdmi.
You're right, looks like I'm mixing up fields from mixer and hdmi. Hmm,
now I'm confused -- I did have some problems applying the patches, but
with this now ruled out I can't really recall anything else that may
have caused this.
Guess I have to repeat the steps. So until further notice, just
disregard everything I said! *g*
With best wishes,
Tobias
>
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> With best wishes,
>> Tobias
>>
>>>> I also noticed that some of the patches ('drm/exynos/hdmi: remove
>>>> private lock code') clash with Gustavo's latest cleanup series [1]. E.g.
>>>> your patch 3/7 ('drm/exynos/hdmi: remove private lock code') touches
>>>> hdmi_commit() which was removed by Gustavo. Maybe you should coordinate
>>>> things with him?
>>> This is always problematic :) I can try to rebase my patches on Gustavo's
>>> if necessary. Gustavo, Inki what is your opinion?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Andrzej
>>>
>>>>
>>>> With best wishes,
>>>> Tobias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg45787.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>>> Hi Inki, Joonyoung,
>>>>>
>>>>> These patches removes obsolete and old structures, to simplify further
>>>>> development. They should not change behavior of the driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patchset is based on exynos-drm-next plus my HDMI related fixes [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> The patchset was tested on Universal and Odroid U3.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/132348
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Andrzej
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrzej Hajda (7):
>>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove old platform data code
>>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: Simplify HPD gpio handling
>>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove private lock code
>>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: add driver data pointer to private context
>>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove redundant configuration fields
>>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v13_conf struct
>>>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v14_conf struct
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 860 ++++++++++-------------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 245 insertions(+), 615 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
