On 2015年07月10日 15:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10.07.2015 15:50, Mark yao wrote:
On 2015年07月10日 13:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver()
will set it.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
index 1a6607beb29f..be881e9fef8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ps8622_driver = {
.remove = ps8622_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "ps8622",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = ps8622_devices,
},
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
index 1b1bf2384815..0ffa3a6a206a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
@@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ptn3460_driver = {
.remove = ptn3460_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "nxp,ptn3460",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = ptn3460_match,
},
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
@@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver
rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
.probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe,
.remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove,
.driver = {
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
But rockchip drm is platform driver not i2c_driver, why remove its .owner ?
Oh, indeed. Thanks for spotting this.
The 'owner' is set by core for platform drivers as well. Most platform
drivers were already converted (I think by Wolfram Sang). I extended
existing coccinelle script to fix also i2c_drivers and sometimes did not
notice that it was platform_driver.
I can split it into two different patches. Would that be ok?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Ok, Thanks for the fix.:-)
--
Ｍark
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
