On 01/07/15 12:37, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> (We need this include in porting changes for the OpenGL ES
> conformance suite.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> intel/intel_bufmgr.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr.h b/intel/intel_bufmgr.h
> index 285919e..f061454 100644
> --- a/intel/intel_bufmgr.h
> +++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
> #include <stdint.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> +#if defined(__cplusplus) || defined(c_plusplus)
> +extern "C" {
> +#endif
> +
Strongly in favour - I've been pondering on this for a very long time.
Just a question - is there a compiler that care about (something from
the last decade) that does not define __cplusplus but c_plusplus ?
Afaict the former is defined since (at least) the 1998 C++ standard,
while the latter is extremely rare, and mostly mentioned as decrecated.
-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
