On 03.07.2015 01:54, Grigori Goronzy wrote:
We don't need to call the (expensive) radeon_bo_wait, checking the
fences via RCU is much faster. The reservation done by radeon_bo_wait
does not save us from any race conditions.
Signed-off-by: Grigori Goronzy <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Patche #1-#3 are Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Patch #4 is a nice catch, but as Michel already noted needs more
thoughts for a complete fix.
Regards,
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
index ac3c131..7199e19 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
@@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ int radeon_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
int radeon_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *filp)
{
- struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
struct drm_radeon_gem_busy *args = data;
struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
struct radeon_bo *robj;
@@ -440,10 +439,16 @@ int radeon_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return -ENOENT;
}
robj = gem_to_radeon_bo(gobj);
- r = radeon_bo_wait(robj, &cur_placement, true);
+
+ r = reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(robj->tbo.resv, true);
+ if (r == 0)
+ r = -EBUSY;
+ else
+ r = 0;
+
+ cur_placement = ACCESS_ONCE(robj->tbo.mem.mem_type);
args->domain = radeon_mem_type_to_domain(cur_placement);
drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(gobj);
- r = radeon_gem_handle_lockup(rdev, r);
return r;
}
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
