[Bug 66963] Rv6xx dpm problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Comment # 265 on bug 66963 from
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #264)
> (In reply to Kajzer from comment #263)
> > git bisect visualize 
> > commit 6101b3ae94b4f266456308824e9ca4eab1235d1a
> > Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> > Date:   Tue Aug 19 11:54:15 2014 -0400
> > 
> >     drm/radeon: fix active cu count for SI and CIK
> >     
> >     This fixes the CU count reported to userspace for
> >     OpenCL.
> >     
> >     bug:
> >     https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82581
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> >     Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
> >     Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Something must have gone wrong in your bisect.  That commit does not affect
> your chip.  Perhaps the bug is somewhat hard to reproduce which caused you
> to mis-mark some commits as good.

Could be the case. Bug is hard to reproduce because it happens only in games
and at random intervals. And you can't idle it. Sadly I don't have much time
for gaming now. I'll try it one more time, more thoroughly.
One question though, if I'm 100% positive that v3.16 is good, should I skip
bisects (mark them as good) if they end up as 3.16.0+ image after bisect ?
Thus testing only v3.17 bisects.
Because out of 7 steps 3 were from 3.17, it can save a lot of time if I could
skip 3.16 bisects.


You are receiving this mail because:
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux