Re: [patch -next] drm/radeon: missing break statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23.06.2015 13:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
There was a merge problem in linux-next 4598d330d29e ('Merge
remote-tracking branch 'drm/drm-next'').  We need to add a break
statement.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

Good catch, fortunately only an issue in drm-next.

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>


diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
index b4b457d..4a119c2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ static int radeon_info_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file
  		break;
  	case RADEON_INFO_VA_UNMAP_WORKING:
  		*value = true;
+		break;
  	case RADEON_INFO_GPU_RESET_COUNTER:
  		*value = atomic_read(&rdev->gpu_reset_counter);
  		break;

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux