2015-05-28 Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/28/2015 05:24 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> > On 05/28/2015 02:39 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
> >> Hi Gustavo,
> >>
> >> On 2015년 05월 28일 05:27, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> >>> Hi Inki,
> >>>
> >>> 2015-05-27 Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Gustavo,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2015년 05월 23일 00:40, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> >>>>> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Run dpms operations through the atomic intefaces. This basically removes
> >>>>> the .dpms() callback from econders and crtcs and use .disable() and
> >>>>> .enable() to turn the crtc on and off.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> v2: Address comments by Joonyoung:
> >>>>> - make hdmi code call ->disable() instead of ->dpms()
> >>>>> - do not use WARN_ON on crtc enable/disable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> v3: - Fix build failure after the hdmi change in v2
> >>>>> - Change dpms helper of ptn3460 bridge
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> Tested-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_crtc.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h | 4 +-
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_encoder.c | 27 ++------
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 6 +-
> >>>>> 10 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
> >>>>> index b604326..d686235 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
> >>>>> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static void ps8622_connector_destroy(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static const struct drm_connector_funcs ps8622_connector_funcs = {
> >>>>> - .dpms = drm_helper_connector_dpms,
> >>>>> + .dpms = drm_atomic_helper_connector_dpms,
> >>>>> .fill_modes = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
> >>>>> .detect = ps8622_detect,
> >>>>> .destroy = ps8622_connector_destroy,
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
> >>>>> index 8ed3617..260bc9f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
> >>>>> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void ptn3460_connector_destroy(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static struct drm_connector_funcs ptn3460_connector_funcs = {
> >>>>> - .dpms = drm_helper_connector_dpms,
> >>>>> + .dpms = drm_atomic_helper_connector_dpms,
> >>>>> .fill_modes = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
> >>>>> .detect = ptn3460_detect,
> >>>>> .destroy = ptn3460_connector_destroy,
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >>>>> index 195fe60..c9995b1 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
> >>>>> @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static void exynos_dp_connector_destroy(struct drm_connector *connector)
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [--snip--]
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> static struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs exynos_crtc_helper_funcs = {
> >>>>> - .dpms = exynos_drm_crtc_dpms,
> >>>>> - .prepare = exynos_drm_crtc_prepare,
> >>>>> - .commit = exynos_drm_crtc_commit,
> >>>>> + .enable = exynos_drm_crtc_enable,
> >>>>> + .disable = exynos_drm_crtc_disable,
> >>>>> .mode_fixup = exynos_drm_crtc_mode_fixup,
> >>>>> .mode_set = drm_helper_crtc_mode_set,
> >>>>> .mode_set_nofb = exynos_drm_crtc_mode_set_nofb,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think it'd be better to use atomic_flush callback to enable global dma
> >>>> like commit callback did. Is there any reason that you don't use
> >>>> atomic_begin and atomic_flush callbacks?
> >>>>
> >>>> atomic relevant codes I looked into do as follows,
> >>>>
> >>>> atomic_begin();
> >>>>
> >>>> atomic_update(); /* this will call win_commit callback to set a overlay
> >>>> relevant registers and enable its dma channel. */
> >>>>
> >>>> atomic_flush();
> >>>>
> >>>> So atomic overlay updating between atomic_begin() ~ atomic_flush() will
> >>>> be guaranteed.
> >>>
> >>> I think we can go down that road, but I'd suggest we push the atomic
> >>> patches v8 (with the lastest comments from Joonyoung fixed) and then
> >>> work on the change you are proposing as a follow-up together with the
> >>> other improvements for atomic I already have queued here. This way
> >>> we don't take the risk of missing one more merge window.
> >>
> >> We(I and Joonyoung) will have discussion about this patch series. For
> >> this, we have already started to analyze entire atomic features
> >> including your patch set so I'd merge it at end of next week according
> >> to the discussion. I'm not kind of sure yet but I will merge it as long
> >> as there is no big problem.
> >>
> >
> > Actually i agree to opinion of Gustavo and will repost the patchset of
> > Gustavo with some patches fixed by me.
> >
>
> Hmm, i meet problem of operations order. It's called .atomic_update
> before enable crtc and called .atomic_disable after disable crtc. It
> means .win_commit and .win_disable just return 0 without any operations
> because e.g. mixer_ctx->powered is 0 in mixer driver, so we cannot
> enable or disable overlay normally.
The removal of the extra win_commit() from exynos_drm_crtc_enable() that
you pointed out in the last review round led to this issue. The
win_commit() call was hiding the issue since we were calling it a second
time with the FIMD device already enabled.
I think we can solve this by creating a specific exynos atomic_commit()
callback that does call
drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_enables(dev, state);
before
drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes(dev, state);
This is the opposite order of what drm atomic default implementation
would do, but we won't hit the issue of having the FIMD clks disabled
when trying to setup the plane. This similar to rcar-du solution to the
same problem.
Gustavo
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
