On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This set of patches mainly contains fix for some memory issues >> using quite aggressively surfaces and other minor problems like >> images going black after a while. >> >> Frediano Ziglio (11): >> Do not cause spice-server to clean our objects >> Do not leak memory if qxl_release_list_add fails >> Fix print statement not using uninitialized variable >> Avoid double free on error >> Handle all errors in qxl_surface_evict >> Fix return for qxl_release_alloc >> Handle correctly failures in qxl_alloc_relase_reserved >> Remove format string errors >> Move main reference counter to GEM object instead of TTM ones >> Simplify cleaning qxl processing command >> Propagate correctly errors from qxlhw_handle_to_bo >> >> qxl/qxl_cmd.c | 11 ++++++----- >> qxl/qxl_display.c | 2 +- >> qxl/qxl_drv.h | 2 +- >> qxl/qxl_gem.c | 10 ++++++++-- >> qxl/qxl_ioctl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------- >> qxl/qxl_object.c | 11 ++++------- >> qxl/qxl_release.c | 13 +++++++++---- >> 7 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) > > The strip level on these patches is rather odd. Normally one would > see a strip level of 1 at the top of the kernel dir. E.g. > > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_gem.c > > in the diffstat, etc. (Sorry for the double reply.) Also, are any of these commits something that should be queued for stable kernel releases? There are a handful that look like they should be to me. josh _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
