Nice catch! Both patches in this series are Reviewed-by: Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
On 26.05.2015 10:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
dev->max_vblank_count contains the largest value that can be represented
by the hardware counter. When the hardware counter wraps around, we have
to add that value + 1 to get the same value as if the hardware counter
didn't wrap around.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index c8a3447..f9634da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
/*
* Interrupts were disabled prior to this call, so deal with counter
* wrap if needed.
- * NOTE! It's possible we lost a full dev->max_vblank_count events
+ * NOTE! It's possible we lost a full dev->max_vblank_count + 1 events
* here if the register is small or we had vblank interrupts off for
* a long time.
*
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void drm_update_vblank_count(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
/* Deal with counter wrap */
diff = cur_vblank - vblank->last;
if (cur_vblank < vblank->last) {
- diff += dev->max_vblank_count;
+ diff += dev->max_vblank_count + 1;
DRM_DEBUG("last_vblank[%d]=0x%x, cur_vblank=0x%x => diff=0x%x\n",
crtc, vblank->last, cur_vblank, diff);
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
