On 22 May 2015 at 02:54, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/21/2015 06:07 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:58:30AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >>> For actual sharing of buffers with other drivers (ie. actual hardware) >>> we'll need to pimp things out a bit better to deal w/ caching, multiple >>> memory domains, etc. See thread: >>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.freedesktop.org_archives_dri-2Ddevel_2015-2DMay_083160.html&d=AwIDAw&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=vpukPkBtpoNQp2IUKuFviOmPNYWVKmen3Jeeu55zmEA&m=5PY5xMHJsYyknpy_IWAegxqACOaf4x60CKosyG0oxCw&s=ciVeRE10840cewxQSgbJ_4YfCH6tU8A1o58k0tHgkD8&e= >>> >>> But for the llvmpipe use-case this isn't a problem. Nor do we really >>> need prime/dri3 (dri2 is sufficient). So until the other issues are >>> sorted lets remove DRIVER_PRIME. >>> >>> v2: also drop the dead code >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> >> Yeah I'm ok with this too, but it pretty much means vgem is a thing for >> llvmpipe only. And then abusing dumb buffers is imo ok too, since I don't >> care too much what kind of horrors drivers pull of internally. >> >> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> >> >> > Well in the end, I'm happy whatever way as long as the root problem is > solved. > > Acked-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> > I've applied this, mainly because controversy is bad, so new APIs should never have any, please try and sort out a decent interface on the list, Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
