Re: block_all_signals() usage in DRM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26 May 2015 at 00:59, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c is the only remaining user of block_all_signals():

It's the only user of it, ever. The API was introduced for the drm locking code.

No other user will ever exist. Just to clear up the an API exists with
one user, we should remove it.


>         /* don't set the block all signals on the master process for now
>          * really probably not the correct answer but lets us debug xkb
>          * xserver for now */
>         if (!file_priv->is_master) {
>                 sigemptyset(&dev->sigmask);
>                 sigaddset(&dev->sigmask, SIGSTOP);
>                 sigaddset(&dev->sigmask, SIGTSTP);
>                 sigaddset(&dev->sigmask, SIGTTIN);
>                 sigaddset(&dev->sigmask, SIGTTOU);
>                 dev->sigdata.context = lock->context;
>                 dev->sigdata.lock = master->lock.hw_lock;
>                 block_all_signals(drm_notifier, dev, &dev->sigmask);
>         }
>
> Is this functionality still in use/needed?
> Otherwise we could get rid of block_all_signals() and unpuzzle the signaling
> code a bit. :-)
>

the functionality is still used, but only on legacy systems, if ABI is
something we care about.

I'll follow up to Oleg mail, just wanted to clarify why there isn't other users.

Dave.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux