Gustavo Padovan wrote: > 2015-05-21 Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> 2015-05-21 Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> like I said before, this clashes with my commit 'drm/exynos: plane: honor >>> buffer offset for dma_addr' (5d878bdb51bd7915ba3def8b531238c67624aa58), >>> which is currently sitting in airlied's drm-fixes. >> >> Inki has to merge his -fixes tree into exynos-drm-next to solve this. >> It is the only way I can rebase on top of your commit and solve the >> conflict. >> Anyway, I just figured that exynos-drm-next was updated from yesterday >> to today so this v5 doesn't apply on today's tree. I'll send a v6 once >> Inki merges "drm/exynos: plane: honor buffer offset for dma_addr" into >> exynos-drm-next. >> >> Inki, can you please do that? so we can proceed with atomic and >> hopefully have it ready for 4.2 merge window. > > Actually the patch is on exynos-drm-next but with a different commit id. > I wonder why. Why did you applied it directly to your branch instead of > merging the -fixes tree? Now we have the same commit with the differents > hashes in the tree. I never do merges for my tree, I always rebase (either on stable/linux or torvalds/master). For submitting patches I cherry-pick stuff to the corresponding upstream branch (exynos-drm-next in this case) and then submit via git-send-email. With best wishes, Tobias > > Gustavo > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
