Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: add staging module option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20 May 2015 at 15:56, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a module option allowing to enable staging/unstable APIs. This will
> allow us to experiment freely with experimental APIs for a while before
> setting them in stone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drm/nouveau/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> index 89049335b738..e4bd6ed51e73 100644
> --- a/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> +++ b/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(runpm, "disable (0), force enable (1), optimus only default (-1
>  int nouveau_runtime_pm = -1;
>  module_param_named(runpm, nouveau_runtime_pm, int, 0400);
>
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(staging, "enable staging APIs");
> +int nouveau_staging = 0;
> +module_param_named(staging, nouveau_staging, int, 0400);
> +
>  static struct drm_driver driver_stub;
>  static struct drm_driver driver_pci;
>  static struct drm_driver driver_platform;
> @@ -895,6 +899,7 @@ nouveau_ioctls[] = {
>         DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_prep, DRM_UNLOCKED|DRM_AUTH|DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>         DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, nouveau_gem_ioctl_cpu_fini, DRM_UNLOCKED|DRM_AUTH|DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
>         DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, nouveau_gem_ioctl_info, DRM_UNLOCKED|DRM_AUTH|DRM_RENDER_ALLOW),
> +       /* Staging ioctls */
>  };
>
>  long
> @@ -1027,6 +1032,7 @@ static void nouveau_display_options(void)
>         DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("... runpm        : %d\n", nouveau_runtime_pm);
>         DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("... vram_pushbuf : %d\n", nouveau_vram_pushbuf);
>         DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("... pstate       : %d\n", nouveau_pstate);
> +       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("... staging      : %d\n", nouveau_staging);
>  }
>
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops nouveau_pm_ops = {
> @@ -1088,6 +1094,18 @@ err_free:
>  static int __init
>  nouveau_drm_init(void)
>  {
> +       /* Do not register staging ioctsl if option not specified */
> +       if (!nouveau_staging) {
> +               unsigned i;
> +
> +               /* This keeps us safe is no staging ioctls are defined */
> +               i = min(driver_stub.num_ioctls, DRM_NOUVEAU_STAGING_IOCTL);
> +               while (!nouveau_ioctls[i - 1].func)
> +                       i--;
> +
> +               driver_stub.num_ioctls = i;
> +       }
Hey Alex,

I've got no specific objection.  But I'm curious as to why you took
this approach as opposed to just adding "if (!nouveau_staging) return
-EINVAL;" directly in the experimental ioctls?  I think, in line with
what's been done in other places, having module options per-api is
perhaps a better choice too.

Ben.

> +
>         driver_pci = driver_stub;
>         driver_pci.set_busid = drm_pci_set_busid;
>         driver_platform = driver_stub;
> diff --git a/drm/nouveau/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/drm/nouveau/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> index 5507eead5863..4e7e21f41b5c 100644
> --- a/drm/nouveau/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> +++ b/drm/nouveau/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> @@ -140,11 +140,14 @@ struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini {
>  #define DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       0x42
>  #define DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       0x43
>  #define DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO           0x44
> +/* range 0x98..DRM_COMMAND_END (8 entries) is reserved for staging, unstable ioctls */
> +#define DRM_NOUVEAU_STAGING_IOCTL      0x58
>
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW            DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, struct drm_nouveau_gem_new)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF        DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
> +/* staging ioctls */
>
>  #endif /* __NOUVEAU_DRM_H__ */
> --
> 2.4.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux