On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a >> > lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide >> > an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload >> > >> > v2: Ccing maintainers >> > >> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the > same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just > those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems > once it's reviewed. Would that be ok? That's an immutable branch I guess, and yeah I think it's OK. I usually only pull these in if/when there are conflicts in -next. Yours, Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
