Re: [PATCH v2] modetest: initialize handles/pitches in set_plane()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Tobias Jakobi
<tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Ilia,
>
> On 2015-04-21 21:15, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> I know it was immensely useful to me when I was adding YUV plane
>> support to nouveau. Seemed to work as advertised at the time (1.5y
>> ago) for YUYV, UYVY, and NV12.
>>
>>   -ilia
>
> maybe you can help me with that question.
>
> Let's consider a user of the DRM interface that wants to feed NV12 data to
> it. NV12 is bi-planar, so the user should provide two
> handles/pitches/offsets describing chroma and luma plane respectively. But
> most of the time chroma and luma is contiguous in memory, with nothing in
> between.
>
> I was wondering if it is an allowed setup to request NV12 as pixelformat,
> but only to provide _one_ handle/pitch/offset? (implying that we are in the
> contiguous setting)

Uhm... I'm no authority on the matter, merely vouching for the
usefulness of the modetest tool :) However I was never aware of any
contiguousness assumptions in NV12, afaik the two different planes are
different :) It could also cause issues if you had, a, say, 32x30
image but whatever hw produced it wanted to make it 32x32. You'd end
up with an offset between the two planes which wouldn't be specified.
FWIW on the (much older) NVIDIA gpu's that I added support for, it
assumes a separate offset:

                nvif_wr32(dev, NV_PVIDEO_UVPLANE_OFFSET_BUFF(flip),
                        nv_fb->nvbo->bo.offset + fb->offsets[1]);

Note that as far as the HW is concerned, it's an entirely separate
memory location, not even an offset from the Y plane -- it could be 2
totally separate bo's for all it cares.

Also, as another datapoint, the VP3 and newer video decoding units on
NVIDIA cards (generally speaking GeForce 200+) have firmware that
produces the Y and UV data as completely separate pieces of data as
well. On VP2 they had to be in the same buffer, but you could provide
an explicit offset to the UV bit.

  -ilia
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux