Hi Joonyoung, 2015-04-03 Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c > >>> index e71e331..e0b085b 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c > >>> @@ -275,9 +275,6 @@ int exynos_drm_fbdev_init(struct drm_device *dev) > >>> > >>> } > >>> > >>> - /* disable all the possible outputs/crtcs before entering KMS mode */ > >>> - drm_helper_disable_unused_functions(dev); > >>> - > >> > >> I think this is not related with atomic dpms support, if this needs, > >> could you make another patch? > > > > Yes, it is, once you port exynos to use atomic dpms we start getting warning > > from this functions, the correct solution is to remove it. Other subsystems > > followed the same approach. > > As i said, the warning comes from changes of this patch. > > From rcar-du driver, it was handled to a separate patch. > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg40384.html Right, I think make this a new patch is no harm and will make things more clear. > > > > I'm sending an updated patch set in a bit. > > OK, but i didn't get your updated patch 10/10 yet. Could you resend it? No, I did a mistake with git send-email. Used 000*.patch to send the patches. That excluded the 0010 one. So I resend a new patchset with the change above and make sure I don't make the same mistake again. Gustavo _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
