On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:54:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:18:28AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On 03/27/2015 01:04 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:39:56AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > >> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> Fix definition of the DRM_IOCTL_I915_GET_SPRITE_COLORKEY ioctl, so that it > > >>> is different from the DRM_IOCTL_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY ioctl. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> Whoa. Broken since its introduction in > > >> > > >> commit 8ea30864229e54b01ac0e9fe88c4b733a940ec4e > > >> Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Date: Tue Jan 3 08:05:39 2012 -0800 > > >> > > >> drm/i915: add color key support v4 > > >> > > >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Nope, we'll just rip it out and replace it all with the drm_noop ioctl. At > > > least I didn't find any userspace anywhere and only broken definitions. > > > Proof enough this isn't useful. > > > > > > Even more so since that means we don't have to convert the get ioctl over > > > to atomic, yay! I'll send patches. > > > > Can we just skip the noop part and delete it altogether? It was only > > added speculatively and obviously never used at all... > > The table is indexed, we need a dummy entry. We shouldn't need any dummies. Any missing entry in the table will be zeroed, so we should simply return -EINVAL due to ioctl->func==NULL. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
