Hello Inki, On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Right, this is not documented but if you have ever checked exynos drm > driver tree, then I think you could know how we use the prefix. Of > course, I don't like to force the use of this prefix but if you and > other people use prefix in the manner of them, exynos drm tree would be > a little bit messy. i.e., DRM: EXYNOS, drm: exynos, drm: Exynos, > drm/exynos, drm/exynos: fimd, drm: exynos: fimd, DRM: EXYNOS: FIMD, ... > so many cases.... Do you really want this? > > So I will always say "please, use right prefix" Otherwise, I will change > it while merging as is. > And I see that other drm drivers have their own way which is not > documented but just implicitly. > I agree with you that people should follow the convention for subject lines used in a subsystem and that it is tedious to tell them to fix the subject and resend but I do agree with Tobias that you should rethink your mail filters. For example I've a filter for all the emails that are directly addressed to me or that I'm cc'ed to. It's true that you may get some emails that are not interesting to you just because people cc'ed you in random patches but I think is better to have false positives than to have false negatives. Specially since you are a kernel maintainer and people expect your feedback / ack for patches to get merged. > Thanks, > Inki Dae > Best regards, Javier _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
