Hi Daniel,
On 25/03/15 01:01, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> Unfortunately, there are some users of libdrm installed headers that like
> to be built with -std=c89 -pedantic, which does not like "inline".
>
> However, __inline works.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xf86drmMode.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xf86drmMode.h b/xf86drmMode.h
> index 856a6bb..2d30184 100644
> --- a/xf86drmMode.h
> +++ b/xf86drmMode.h
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ typedef struct _drmModeProperty {
> uint32_t *blob_ids; /* store the blob IDs */
> } drmModePropertyRes, *drmModePropertyPtr;
>
> -static inline int drm_property_type_is(drmModePropertyPtr property,
> +static __inline int drm_property_type_is(drmModePropertyPtr property,
Can you share the name of those users ?
>From a quick look clang and gcc are ok with this change, although some
versions of the Sun compiler are not. Considering that most programs try
to use c99 and later, might I suggest that you add a trivial wrapper in
your program ? Something along the lines of
#ifndef inline
#define inline __inline
#endif
-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
