On 19/03/15 16:35, Damien Lespiau wrote: > It seems that the tests don't need DRM master anymore? at least make > distcheck passes when X is running. > > release.sh is also invoked with just the path to the libdrm git checkout > and we don't want to pass additional arguments that will be treated as > additional modules we want to release. > > Also, make a note that release.sh will run make distcheck for you, so we > don't strickly need to run it beforehand. > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > RELEASING | 19 +++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/RELEASING b/RELEASING > index 3f07146..e17dbea 100644 > --- a/RELEASING > +++ b/RELEASING > @@ -20,13 +20,12 @@ Follow these steps to release a new version of libdrm: > 4) Run autoconf and then re-run ./configure so the build system > picks up the new version number. > > - 5) Verify that the code passes "make distcheck". libdrm is tricky > - to distcheck since the test suite will need to become drm master. > - This means that you need to run it outside X, that is, in text > - mode (KMS or no KMS doesn't matter). > + 5) (optional step, release.sh will make distcheck for you, but it can be > + heart warming to verify that make distcheck passes) > > - Running "make distcheck" should result in no warnings or errors > - and end with a message of the form: > + Verify that the code passes "make distcheck". Running "make > + distcheck" should result in no warnings or errors and end with a > + message of the form: > Side note: Pretty sure that current make distcheck produces a handful of warnings ;-) Although we'll try to have them sorted by next release. With my comment in patch 2 and Ilia's in 3 the series is Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks for the update. Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
