On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Doesn't this require a kernel version that has your other patch? What >> happens when this runs on an older kernel? Does it get silently >> ignored, or does it end up erroring out? If it errors out, that's >> fine. Otherwise some sort of version check should be put in, no? > > The corresponding kernel patch is already merged in Ben's tree. If > running with an older kernel, this flag will be a no-op, which is fine > since GK20A's GPU (the reason for this patch as you have guessed :)) > is not enabled for these kernels. > > I am fine with adding a version check if you think it is necessary. So as discussed on IRC, I will check the DRM version from Mesa. This patch should be good to go - it will require a version increase in libdrm though. Let me know if you want me to send a patch for this too. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
