On 27 February 2015 at 18:07, Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/drmstat.c | 8 ++++---- > tests/kmstest/main.c | 2 +- > tests/modeprint/modeprint.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > tests/proptest/proptest.c | 2 +- > tests/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 ++-- > xf86drm.c | 2 +- > xf86drmMode.c | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/drmstat.c b/tests/drmstat.c > index 5935d07..36cc70d 100644 > --- a/tests/drmstat.c > +++ b/tests/drmstat.c > @@ -81,13 +81,13 @@ static void getversion(int fd) > printf( "No driver available\n" ); > } > } > - > -void handler(int fd, void *oldctx, void *newctx) > + > +static void handler(int fd, void *oldctx, void *newctx) > { > printf("Got fd %d\n", fd); > } > It's only "user" was commented out as a transition to libdrm2 afaict. Should be safe to nuke alongside the commented out caller. > -void process_sigio(char *device) > +static void process_sigio(char *device) > { > int fd; > > @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > return r; > } > > -void DRM_PRINTFLIKE(4, 0) > +static void DRM_PRINTFLIKE(4, 0) > xf86VDrvMsgVerb(int scrnIndex, int type, int verb, const char *format, > va_list args) Think don't need to bother making this static and just nuke it. It seems like it was added by mistake (commit c3092ead642) and never used. ... > diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c > index e117bc6..016247f 100644 > --- a/xf86drm.c > +++ b/xf86drm.c > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ drmMsg(const char *format, ...) > } > } > > -void > +static void > drmSetDebugMsgFunction(debug_msg_func_t debug_msg_ptr) > { > drm_debug_print = debug_msg_ptr; > diff --git a/xf86drmMode.c b/xf86drmMode.c > index 9ea8fe7..1c06a19 100644 > --- a/xf86drmMode.c > +++ b/xf86drmMode.c > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static inline int DRM_IOCTL(int fd, unsigned long cmd, void *arg) > * Util functions > */ > > -void* drmAllocCpy(void *array, int count, int entry_size) > +static void* drmAllocCpy(void *array, int count, int entry_size) Strictly speaking these could still be used, despite never being part of the API. Although my vote (fwiw) would be to that we're safe. Cheers, Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel