Hi Russell, On Thursday 26 February 2015 09:20:08 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:52:02AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Friday 16 January 2015 17:47:34 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:37:43PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> Replace the internal EDID read implementation by a call to the new > >>> EDID > >>> read core function. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > >>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> Tested-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thanks, committed, and updated the summary line to: > >> > >> "drm/i2c: tda998x: use drm_do_get_edid()" > >> > >> to match the style used in the past. > > > > I can't see the patch in Dave's -next branch, has it been lost somewhere ? > > I thought I had sent a pull request before the last merge window, but > it seems I didn't. That's the problem when you end up carrying too many > patches... tracking what's been sent and to whom is a real pain. The > only time I get to verify what's been sent is after it's appeared in > mainline (so after a merge window). No worries. Looks like I'm part of a distributed patch tracker system then ;-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
