Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/8] clk: add helper function clk_is_match()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 26.02.2015, 09:02 +0000 schrieb Ben Dooks:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
[...]
> > From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:11:01 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] clk: introduce clk_is_match
> > 
> > Some drivers compare struct clk pointers as a means of knowing
> > if the two pointers reference the same clock hardware. This behavior is
> > dubious (drivers must not dereference struct clk), but did not cause any
> > regressions until the per-user struct clk patch was merged. Now the test
> > for matching clk's will always fail with per-user struct clk's.
> > 
> > clk_is_match is introduced to fix the regression and prevent drivers
> > from comparing the pointers manually.
> 
> small observaton, clk_is_same() is linguistically nicer.

How about clk_equal() ?

regards
Philipp

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux