On 06.02.2015 17:29, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:51:55AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 06.02.2015 09:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> I just started getting X failures that say: >>> >>> [ 739.208] (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] failed to set drm interface version. >>> >>> I'm not sure what triggered it. >>> >>> dmesg says: >>> >>> [ 740.156499] [drm:drm_stub_open] >>> [ 740.156502] [drm:drm_open_helper] pid = 2170, minor = 0 >>> [ 740.156541] [drm:drm_ioctl] pid=2170, dev=0xe200, auth=1, >>> DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETRESOURCES >>> [ 740.156557] [drm:drm_ioctl] pid=2170, dev=0xe200, auth=1, >>> DRM_IOCTL_MODE_GETRESOURCES >>> [ 740.156575] [drm:drm_release] open_count = 2 >>> [ 740.156577] [drm:drm_release] pid = 2170, device = 0xe200, open_count = 2 >>> [ 740.158548] [drm:drm_ioctl] pid=2170, dev=0xe200, auth=1, >>> DRM_IOCTL_SET_VERSION >>> [ 740.158549] [drm:drm_ioctl] ret = -13 >>> [ 740.159612] [drm:drm_framebuffer_reference] ffff8804457110a0: FB ID: 83 (3) >>> >>> -13 means -EACCES. >> >> We'd need to see dmesg from the beginning to be sure, but it looks like >> something (maybe plymouth or whatever boot splash you're using?) is >> keeping the DRM device open, so Xorg doesn't become DRM master. > > The trick is to inspect /sys/kernel/debug/dri/%d/clients at the time it > fails and see who the kernel thinks is DRM_MASTER. That's a neat trick, thanks. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel