Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Replace the hw mutex with a hw spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Dave,

It's intended for -fixes. I was just about to send a pull request but
got distracted.

Thanks,
Thomas


On 01/21/2015 12:45 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 19 January 2015 at 21:03, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Fixes a case where we call vmw_fifo_idle() from within a wait function with
>> task state !TASK_RUNNING, which is illegal.
>>
>> In addition, make the locking fine-grained, so that it is performed once
>> for every read- and write operation. This is of course more costly, but we
>> don't perform much register access in the timing critical paths anyway. Instead
>> we have the extra benefit of being sure that we don't forget the hw lock around
>> register accesses. I think currently the kms code was quite buggy w r t this.
> So what is your feeling on this for -fixes?
>
> Dave.
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux