Hi Russell, On Friday 16 January 2015 16:26:00 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:17:39PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Friday 16 January 2015 15:46:28 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 05:44:52PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> Hi Dave, > >>> > >>> The following changes since commit > >>> adc31849b27fefeca6c225d3895143a2ec6970fa: > >>> Merge tag 'drm-intel-next-2014-12-19' of > >>> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm- > >>> > >>> intel into drm-next (2015-01-10 08:46:24 +1000) > >>> > >>> are available in the git repository at: > >>> git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/tda998x > >> > >> Err... please send to me instead so I can merge them with the other > >> patches I have queued. > > > > I've sent you an e-mail a couple of weeks ago to ask whether you wanted to > > take the patch in your tree (see > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/119214). > > Yes, I found it, you sent it on the 23rd December. Do you not think people > would be busy around Christmas time, and possibly would not bother reading > email? > > Personally, I decided to stop on the weekend before Christmas, and only > resume on the 5th Jan. However, I was ill with the flu, and I'm still > recovering from that three weeks on, so I didn't resume on the 5th - > that meant a few hundred extra messages, and I ended up deciding just > to ignore all that email (which included your message), rather than try > to catch up. If it wasn't clear from my previous mail, no blame meant at all. > However, upon reading your email, and the original, you indicated that it > depends on another patch which I have no visibility of: > > | This patch has been compile-tested only as I lack test hardware. It > | depends on "[PATCH v4 6/9] drm: Decouple EDID parsing from I2C adapter" > | previously posted to the dri-devel mailing list. > > How can I merge your patch when you say that it depends on another patch > which I have no access to? What is the status of this patch? Is it > merged into mainline, or is it a patch in Dave's DRM tree? The patch has been merged in v3.19-rc1 as 18df89fef2d5c7cfd15ab898b17a292d00222b0c. > > I'm certainly not in a good position to complain when mails slip through > > the cracks ;-) > > > > Could you please take this patch in your tree and push it for v3.20 ? > > I'm not entirely thrilled by the thought of merging Dave's tree into mine. > Would it be possible to base it on some -rc release please? What about > its dependent patch, which presumably this patch breaks without? The patch applies on v3.19-rc1 without any issue. For your convenience I've just resent it with the Reviewed-by and Tested-by lines. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
