Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/edid: Tighten checksum conditions for CEA blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 21 November 2014 15:39:40 you wrote:

> I still feel like this should be embedded in drm_edid_block_valid
> somehow. Who's going to print the bad edid now? Is it simply no longer
> printed in this loop?
> 
> I'll defer to others; any better suggestions?
> 
> Jani.
> 

This can not be embedded in drm_edid_block_valid, as the function is 
completely "passive", but we must be able to trigger a retransmission of the 
bad block.

Regarding printing, this should be added.

Thinking about it, maybe factor out the printing routine, and add the zero 
block handling to it?

Kind regards,

Stefan
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux