Comment # 1
on bug 86368
from debguy
(all i meant with comments are: goal is not to continually upgrade gcc, bison, etc, causing old code to be incompatible and faile: but to compile new software: which is easily possible with early tools, new ELF or arch aside. __builtin could be a macro or check to see if accel was avail, rather than using a tweak in gcc only new gcc has. gcc is not the place to add convenience functions: it's just not where they go. libc might be. even then for a bit count that's the wrong avenue to expect C libs to be a "perl, unix in a big module" of every new new bithack stacked against every kernel support of. i was pretty user processor support hacks are per arch in kernel, and lib c sparsely supported them and driver coders commonly checked in the driver code where useful for such, having both choices on hand)
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
