On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:40:00PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Yep, it's weird, I know. :)
But sure, saving opcode space, makes sense to me.
Btw, I'd still be interested about this:
> +static inline void clwb(volatile void *__p)
> +{
> + alternative_io_2(".byte " __stringify(NOP_DS_PREFIX) "; clflush %P0",
Any particular reason for using 0x3e as a prefix to have the insns be
the same size or is it simply because CLFLUSH can stomach it?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
