Hi Inki,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sorry for late. I missed this patch a little bit for long time.
Thanks for reviewing.
>
>
> On 2014년 09월 15일 22:13, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Now that we have moved to generic phy based bindings,
>> we don't need to have any code related to older dptx-phy.
>> Nobody is using this dptx-phy anymore, so removing the
>> same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 58 +++++++------------------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.h | 2 --
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>> index 4f3c7eb..5ffc1b2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>> @@ -1050,28 +1050,14 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display,
>>
>> static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>> {
>> - if (dp->phy) {
>> + if (dp->phy)
>> phy_power_on(dp->phy);
>> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) {
>> - u32 reg;
>> -
>> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr);
>> - reg |= dp->enable_mask;
>> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr);
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>> {
>> - if (dp->phy) {
>> + if (dp->phy)
>> phy_power_off(dp->phy);
>> - } else if (dp->phy_addr) {
>> - u32 reg;
>> -
>> - reg = __raw_readl(dp->phy_addr);
>> - reg &= ~(dp->enable_mask);
>> - __raw_writel(reg, dp->phy_addr);
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display)
>> @@ -1210,39 +1196,21 @@ static struct video_info *exynos_dp_dt_parse_pdata(struct device *dev)
>>
>> static int exynos_dp_dt_parse_phydata(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *dp_phy_node = of_node_get(dp->dev->of_node);
>> - u32 phy_base;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - dp_phy_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy_node, "dptx-phy");
>> - if (!dp_phy_node) {
>> - dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp");
>> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dp->phy);
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "reg", &phy_base)) {
>> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get reg for dptx-phy\n");
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> - goto err;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (of_property_read_u32(dp_phy_node, "samsung,enable-mask",
>> - &dp->enable_mask)) {
>> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to get enable-mask for dptx-phy\n");
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> - goto err;
>> - }
>> -
>> - dp->phy_addr = ioremap(phy_base, SZ_4);
>> - if (!dp->phy_addr) {
>> - dev_err(dp->dev, "failed to ioremap dp-phy\n");
>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>> - goto err;
>> + dp->phy = devm_phy_get(dp->dev, "dp");
>> + if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(dp->phy);
>> + if (ret == -ENOSYS || ret == -ENODEV) {
>> + dp->phy = NULL;
>> + } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> + return ret;
>> + } else {
>
> WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> #146: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c:1208:
> + return ret;
> + } else {
>
> How about just returning ret like below?
> if (IS_ERR(dp->phy)) {
> dev_err(dp->dev, "no DP phy configured\n");
> return PTR_ERR(ret);
> }
>
> And then you can handle the error at probe function properly.
Right, point taken. Will post the reworked patch.
[snip]
--
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
