From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> I wasn't sure if TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN works correctly with non-0 lpfn, but AFAICT it does. Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c index 9c92976..d23b0dd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c @@ -179,9 +179,7 @@ void radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct radeon_bo *rbo, u32 domain) * improve fragmentation quality. * 512kb was measured as the most optimal number. */ - if (!((rbo->flags & RADEON_GEM_CPU_ACCESS) && - (rbo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM)) && - rbo->tbo.mem.size > 512 * 1024) { + if (rbo->tbo.mem.size > 512 * 1024) { for (i = 0; i < c; i++) { rbo->placements[i].flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN; } -- 2.1.1 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel