On 10/27/2014 03:17 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index dd31933..476679c 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -3071,6 +3071,13 @@ F: drivers/gpu/vga/ >> F: include/drm/ >> F: include/uapi/drm/ >> >> +DRM MIPI DSI BUS >> +M: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> +L: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> +S: Supported >> +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c >> +F: include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h > > I really prefer when common infrastructure like this doesn't get > maintainer by a vendor. And I care with my intel hat on since we also ahve > a dsi driver that sooner or later needs to be converted to to this stuff. > > Why doesn't the usual model of merging stuff through Dave's tree, or if > that doesn't work well due to patch depencies, through vendor trees with > Dave's ack? The main intention of this patch is to be on CC in case of patches touching MIPI DSI bus. I do not want to create separate tree for such small subsystem. So if such things are not allowed please drop the patch and sorry for the noise. Regards Andrzej > > Thanks, Daniel > >> + >> RADEON DRM DRIVERS >> M: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >> M: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dri-devel mailing list >> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
