> >> That said, Nicolas Ferre (Cc'ing) at some point requested this to become > >> a select (or at least for the DRM driver, but I guess the same applies > >> to PWM) on the grounds that a depends on will make it more difficult to > >> enable the driver. > > > > It's not that much more difficult. It just entails enabling 3 instead > > of 2 config options. > > Yes it is more difficult. Believe me, it's a mess, but... > > > Once all of the required components are merged, > > feel free to drop back to 'select'. This is easier than sharing round > > immutable branches all over the place. > > .. I agree with this option of moving to an easier-to-merge solution and > then dealing with the ease of use. > > >> So we have two options here: 1) turn the select into a depends on here > >> and allow the dependency to be resolved that way, or 2) solve the > >> dependency by making sure the MFD part is merged first (either by > >> pulling the MFD tree into the PWM and DRM trees or waiting for a full > >> cycle for the MFD changes to land). > >> > >> I don't mind either way. > > > > I'll go with either of the two suggestions above. > > So, Lee and Thierry, you can both take your part in your respective > trees with the change (1) described above and with my: > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> Works for me. The MFD part has already been applied. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
