Comment # 23
on bug 84627
from smoki
(In reply to Michel Dänzer from comment #22) > What I meant is that there's no fundamental difference between doing that > and running 32 bit apps in a 64-bit distro installation. I know, should not be any difference but yeah don't know what happens... > To clarify though, for that test did you install a > linux-image-*-amd64_*_i386.deb in the 32-bit install, or did you manually > copy the kernel from the 64-bit install? If the former, can you also try the > latter to rule out any difference between the *_i386.deb and *_amd64.deb? I run normaly pae kernel there that is default on pure 32bit for me. Yes i tried that one too: amd64 kernel packaged in i386.deb. Those both and my compiled kernel have corruption. Tried now what you said pure 64bit kernel packaged as amd64.deb and voila no corruption with it! Both are distro kernels from experimental and my kernels behave the same there, 32bit as i386.deb one give corruptions, 64bit and packaged as amd64.deb works fine. But hmmm, how and why those differ both are 64bit in different package or?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
