Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Clarify irq_lock locking, irq handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:35:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> irq handlers always run with interrupts locally disabled, so
> plain spinlocks is all we need. I've also reviewed again that they
> all follow the _irq_handler postfix convention.

Hmm, we still have the full irq dance inside the reg read/write macros,
which themselves should never be used from inside the irq handlers.

(Modulo the misgivings in execlists_irq_handler).
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux