On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:14:31PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:54:22PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> > [...]
> >> +void backlight_set_brightness(struct backlight_device *bd, unsigned int value,
> >> + enum backlight_update_reason reason)
> >> +{
> >> + mutex_lock(&bd->ops_lock);
> >> + if (bd->ops) {
> >> + value = clamp(value, 0U, (unsigned)bd->props.max_brightness);
> >
> > max_brightness should really be unsigned to begin with...
> >
> >> + pr_debug("set brightness to %u\n", value);
> >
> > dev_dbg(&bd->dev, ...)?
>
> I agree with both comments, but I tried to be consistent with what
> brightness_store() does.
Fair enough, this can be cleaned up in separate patches.
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/backlight.h b/include/linux/backlight.h
> >> index adb14a8..bcc0dec 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/backlight.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/backlight.h
> >> @@ -141,6 +141,22 @@ extern bool backlight_device_registered(enum backlight_type type);
> >> extern int backlight_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >> extern int backlight_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> >>
> >> +struct backlight_device *backlight_device_lookup(const char *name);
> >> +void backlight_set_brightness(struct backlight_device *bd, unsigned int value,
> >> + enum backlight_update_reason reason);
> >> +
> >> +static inline void backlight_device_ref(struct backlight_device *bd)
> >> +{
> >> + if (bd)
> >> + get_device(&bd->dev);
> >> +}
> >
> > Perhaps for consistency with get_device() this should return bd? That
> > way you can chain things like so:
> >
> > priv->backlight = backlight_device_ref(bd);
>
> Makes sense, will change it. Same is actually true for _unref(), which
> should return NULL unconditionally. This way, you can use:
> priv->backlight = backlight_device_unref(priv->backlight);
> to release a reference and reset the pointer at the same time.
That looks somewhat odd to me. Wouldn't priv->backlight typically go
away after the unref anyway (presumably because priv is going to get
freed soon after)?
But I have no strong objections to returning NULL from _unref(), if code
doesn't need it it can always choose not to use the return value.
Thierry
Attachment:
pgpOyD3DSJllD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
