Rob Clark reports a lockdep splat that involves the prepare_lock
chained with the mmap semaphore.
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.17.0-rc1-00050-g07a489b #802 Tainted: G W
-------------------------------------------------------
Xorg.bin/5413 is trying to acquire lock:
(prepare_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0781280>] clk_prepare_lock+0x88/0xfc
but task is already holding lock:
(qcom_iommu_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c079f664>] qcom_iommu_unmap+0x1c/0x1f0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #4 (qcom_iommu_lock){+.+...}:
[<c079f860>] qcom_iommu_map+0x28/0x450
[<c079eb50>] iommu_map+0xc8/0x12c
[<c056c1fc>] msm_iommu_map+0xb4/0x130
[<c05697bc>] msm_gem_get_iova_locked+0x9c/0xe8
[<c0569854>] msm_gem_get_iova+0x4c/0x64
[<c0562208>] mdp4_kms_init+0x4c4/0x6c0
[<c056881c>] msm_load+0x2ac/0x34c
[<c0545724>] drm_dev_register+0xac/0x108
[<c0547510>] drm_platform_init+0x50/0xf0
[<c0578a60>] try_to_bring_up_master.part.3+0xc8/0x108
[<c0578b48>] component_master_add_with_match+0xa8/0x104
[<c0568294>] msm_pdev_probe+0x64/0x70
[<c057e704>] platform_drv_probe+0x2c/0x60
[<c057cff8>] driver_probe_device+0x108/0x234
[<c057b65c>] bus_for_each_drv+0x64/0x98
[<c057cec0>] device_attach+0x78/0x8c
[<c057c590>] bus_probe_device+0x88/0xac
[<c057c9b8>] deferred_probe_work_func+0x68/0x9c
[<c0259db4>] process_one_work+0x1a0/0x40c
[<c025a710>] worker_thread+0x44/0x4d8
[<c025ec54>] kthread+0xd8/0xec
[<c020e9a8>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c
-> #3 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}:
[<c0541188>] drm_gem_mmap+0x38/0xd0
[<c05695b8>] msm_gem_mmap+0xc/0x5c
[<c02f0b6c>] mmap_region+0x35c/0x6c8
[<c02f11ec>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x314/0x398
[<c02de1e0>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x84/0xb4
[<c02ef83c>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x94/0xbc
[<c020e8e0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48
-> #2 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
[<c0321138>] filldir64+0x68/0x180
[<c0333fe0>] dcache_readdir+0x188/0x22c
[<c0320ed0>] iterate_dir+0x9c/0x11c
[<c03213b0>] SyS_getdents64+0x78/0xe8
[<c020e8e0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48
-> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){+.+.+.}:
[<c03fc544>] __create_file+0x58/0x1dc
[<c03fc70c>] debugfs_create_dir+0x1c/0x24
[<c0781c7c>] clk_debug_create_subtree+0x20/0x170
[<c0be2af8>] clk_debug_init+0xec/0x14c
[<c0208c70>] do_one_initcall+0x8c/0x1c8
[<c0b9cce4>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13c/0x1dc
[<c0877bc4>] kernel_init+0x8/0xe8
[<c020e9a8>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c
-> #0 (prepare_lock){+.+.+.}:
[<c087c408>] mutex_lock_nested+0x70/0x3e8
[<c0781280>] clk_prepare_lock+0x88/0xfc
[<c0782c50>] clk_prepare+0xc/0x24
[<c079f474>] __enable_clocks.isra.4+0x18/0xa4
[<c079f614>] __flush_iotlb_va+0xe0/0x114
[<c079f6f4>] qcom_iommu_unmap+0xac/0x1f0
[<c079ea3c>] iommu_unmap+0x9c/0xe8
[<c056c2fc>] msm_iommu_unmap+0x64/0x84
[<c0569da4>] msm_gem_free_object+0x11c/0x338
[<c05413ec>] drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked+0xfc/0x130
[<c0541604>] drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x50/0x68
[<c0447a98>] idr_for_each+0xa8/0xdc
[<c0541c10>] drm_gem_release+0x1c/0x28
[<c0540b3c>] drm_release+0x370/0x428
[<c031105c>] __fput+0x98/0x1e8
[<c025d73c>] task_work_run+0xb0/0xfc
[<c02477ec>] do_exit+0x2ec/0x948
[<c0247ec0>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xb8
[<c025180c>] get_signal+0x28c/0x6ac
[<c0211204>] do_signal+0xc4/0x3e4
[<c02116cc>] do_work_pending+0xb4/0xc4
[<c020e938>] work_pending+0xc/0x20
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
prepare_lock --> &dev->struct_mutex --> qcom_iommu_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(qcom_iommu_lock);
lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
lock(qcom_iommu_lock);
lock(prepare_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by Xorg.bin/5413:
#0: (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0540800>] drm_release+0x34/0x428
#1: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c05413bc>] drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked+0xcc/0x130
#2: (qcom_iommu_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c079f664>] qcom_iommu_unmap+0x1c/0x1f0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5413 Comm: Xorg.bin Tainted: G W 3.17.0-rc1-00050-g07a489b #802
[<c0216290>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0211d8c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c0211d8c>] (show_stack) from [<c087a078>] (dump_stack+0x98/0xb8)
[<c087a078>] (dump_stack) from [<c027f024>] (print_circular_bug+0x218/0x340)
[<c027f024>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c0283e08>] (__lock_acquire+0x1d24/0x20b8)
[<c0283e08>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0284774>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0xbc)
[<c0284774>] (lock_acquire) from [<c087c408>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x70/0x3e8)
[<c087c408>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c0781280>] (clk_prepare_lock+0x88/0xfc)
[<c0781280>] (clk_prepare_lock) from [<c0782c50>] (clk_prepare+0xc/0x24)
[<c0782c50>] (clk_prepare) from [<c079f474>] (__enable_clocks.isra.4+0x18/0xa4)
[<c079f474>] (__enable_clocks.isra.4) from [<c079f614>] (__flush_iotlb_va+0xe0/0x114)
[<c079f614>] (__flush_iotlb_va) from [<c079f6f4>] (qcom_iommu_unmap+0xac/0x1f0)
[<c079f6f4>] (qcom_iommu_unmap) from [<c079ea3c>] (iommu_unmap+0x9c/0xe8)
[<c079ea3c>] (iommu_unmap) from [<c056c2fc>] (msm_iommu_unmap+0x64/0x84)
[<c056c2fc>] (msm_iommu_unmap) from [<c0569da4>] (msm_gem_free_object+0x11c/0x338)
[<c0569da4>] (msm_gem_free_object) from [<c05413ec>] (drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked+0xfc/0x130)
[<c05413ec>] (drm_gem_object_handle_unreference_unlocked) from [<c0541604>] (drm_gem_object_release_handle+0x50/0x68)
[<c0541604>] (drm_gem_object_release_handle) from [<c0447a98>] (idr_for_each+0xa8/0xdc)
[<c0447a98>] (idr_for_each) from [<c0541c10>] (drm_gem_release+0x1c/0x28)
[<c0541c10>] (drm_gem_release) from [<c0540b3c>] (drm_release+0x370/0x428)
[<c0540b3c>] (drm_release) from [<c031105c>] (__fput+0x98/0x1e8)
[<c031105c>] (__fput) from [<c025d73c>] (task_work_run+0xb0/0xfc)
[<c025d73c>] (task_work_run) from [<c02477ec>] (do_exit+0x2ec/0x948)
[<c02477ec>] (do_exit) from [<c0247ec0>] (do_group_exit+0x4c/0xb8)
[<c0247ec0>] (do_group_exit) from [<c025180c>] (get_signal+0x28c/0x6ac)
[<c025180c>] (get_signal) from [<c0211204>] (do_signal+0xc4/0x3e4)
[<c0211204>] (do_signal) from [<c02116cc>] (do_work_pending+0xb4/0xc4)
[<c02116cc>] (do_work_pending) from [<c020e938>] (work_pending+0xc/0x20)
We can break this chain if we don't hold the prepare_lock while
creating debugfs directories. We only hold the prepare_lock right
now because we're traversing the clock tree recursively and we
don't want the hierarchy to change during the traversal.
Replacing this traversal with a simple linked list walk allows us
to only grab a list lock instead of the prepare_lock, thus
breaking the lock chain.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 38 +++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index cf5df744cb21..ffec3814915a 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -302,26 +302,12 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-/* caller must hold prepare_lock */
static int clk_debug_create_subtree(struct clk *clk, struct dentry *pdentry)
{
- struct clk *child;
- int ret = -EINVAL;;
-
if (!clk || !pdentry)
- goto out;
-
- ret = clk_debug_create_one(clk, pdentry);
-
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(child, &clk->children, child_node)
- clk_debug_create_subtree(child, pdentry);
+ return -EINVAL;
- ret = 0;
-out:
- return ret;
+ return clk_debug_create_one(clk, pdentry);
}
/**
@@ -337,15 +323,10 @@ out:
*/
static int clk_debug_register(struct clk *clk)
{
- int ret = 0;
-
if (!inited)
- goto out;
-
- ret = clk_debug_create_subtree(clk, rootdir);
+ return 0;
-out:
- return ret;
+ return clk_debug_create_subtree(clk, rootdir);
}
/**
@@ -417,17 +398,12 @@ static int __init clk_debug_init(void)
if (!d)
return -ENOMEM;
- clk_prepare_lock();
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(clk, &clk_root_list, child_node)
- clk_debug_create_subtree(clk, rootdir);
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(clk, &clk_orphan_list, child_node)
+ mutex_lock(&clk_lookup_lock);
+ hlist_for_each_entry(clk, &clk_lookup_list, lookup_node)
clk_debug_create_subtree(clk, rootdir);
inited = 1;
-
- clk_prepare_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&clk_lookup_lock);
return 0;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
